Is nutrition a science or religion?

Opinions regarding how we feed ourselves and our pets are numerous, diverse, and often inexplicable. Eating is an intimate act between our bodies and the Earth, so it makes sense that we should all take time to consider how

we obtain nourishment. Our world view often impacts what we value in foods. Many people desire safe, environmentally sustainable food that does not contribute to undo animal suffering. Seeking to feed pets in a way that respects their biologic requirements while keeping with our own personal values is a legitimate and respectable goal.

However, too many pet owners are confusing real social or environmental benefits with marketing strategies set forth by pet food companies. Terms such as holistic, natural, premium, etc. mean very little in the context of how a pet food is sourced or manufactured. In addition, ingredients such as by-products can be a great source of nutrients and environmentally friendly method to feed pets while also meeting the global demands for food (see previous posts about pet food ingredients).

My plea to pet owners is to respect the knowledge and advice your veterinarian gives regarding the best foods for your pets, particularly those who require specialized diets for their health. While every company seeks to make a profit, pet food manufacturers that invest millions of dollars to research and develop therapeutic diets to improve and prolong the health of sick dogs and cats are not trying to hurt your pet. In addition, your veterinarian honestly just wants your dog or cat to eat the best food that will aid with their medical condition.

So next time you see an ad on television or Facebook making claims about certain things in pet food being good or bad, ask yourself if the author is basing those claims on research and medical evidence or their own personal philosophies (or are they trying to sell you something).